I have had the pleasure of taking part in a number of interesting discussions over the past week regarding the future of the anti-LBAM spray movement in California. Friends, neighbors, scientists and politicians are discussing positions to take in the face of the California Department of Food and Agriculture continuing to insist that the light brown apple moth can and must be eradicated. During the past year, we have repeatedly heard from independent scientists that eradication is neither necessary nor possible for this basically harmless insect, and yet CDFA continues to march forward like an army of zombies, armed with their chemical weapons, declaring that they can and will cover California with pesticides, toxic lab substances and genetically engineered insects.
Because, for me, the heart of the issue has always been a human rights one, the resounding question posed is: Who Has The Right To Poison Me?
In a nation where poisoning humans and wildlife is illegal, I am left with a simple equation regarding CDFA’s past and present intentions towards the people and animals of California.

How can we get California to recognize and admit that civilization has now learned that pesticides harm and kill lifeforms and are poisonous? How can we get California to profess that anyone caught in the act of spraying, splatting or dusting pesticides is, in fact, poisoning his neighbors?
I believe if we want to reform our beloved but toxic state, pesticide = poison is the basic equation we need to be teaching from kindergarten upwards with zero tolerance for any man who poisons citizens.
I Take It Personally
My husband and I are finally on the verge of escaping a situation in which our neighbor, an alcohol grower, has subjected us to bi-monthly poisoning, 9 months a year, for all of the years we’ve lived here.
My husband, a non-smoking, healthy, young man has suffered severe lung problems including pneumonia, bronchitis and recurrent pleurisy. At one point, his doctor thought he had cancer because of a mass found in his lung. It turned out to be a patch of pneumonia that was slow in clearing up, but for several months, I lived in an agony of fear that my young and dear husband was going to die of lung cancer. Our medical bills were so high, we are still trying to pay them off.
As for myself, also a young person but one in poor health with several auto-immune illnesses, I have been repeatedly sickened and even hospitalized following my neighbor, the poisoner’s, spraying of his vineyard and my home. This has increased our medical debt.
We have been driven from our home, night after night, and have had to pay for hotel rooms too many times to count over the past few years. We have been unable to work on spray days, losing money we badly needed. We have suffered severe loss of health and income.
Our pleas to our neighbor, the poisoner, fell on deaf ears. We were laughed at, yelled at, sneered at and told we were crazy. When my husband called the winery in question to ask that they begin notifying us of their spray dates because his wife (me) was being sickened by the spraying, the manager scoffed, “what, is she allergic to air?”
Obviously, you know and I know that alcohol growers are not spraying their fields with air, but this is the reception with which we met as we lost our health, drained our bank account and fled into the night to escape being poisoned.
So I take it personally. And we have no recourse because California’s laws protect the alcohol grower, the poisoner, and not us. I take it very personally that CDFA is now taking the same line across California, asserting they will fill our habitat with poison, calling it anything but poison.
Pesticide is poison and the aerial spraying, ground spraying, twist ties, telephone pole splats and traps in CDFA’s arsenal are all poisonous. California needs to rethink the equation, rethink the very basic question: is it legal to poison people?
The answer to this question is found in our already-existing laws. So, the work is simply to get California to designate pesticides as poisons and pesticide users as poisoners. The law will then know how to deal with them.
But, of course, it won’t be easy. Please take a look at this map I’ve spent hours creating over the past year. This is Highway 12 which runs between Santa Rosa and Napa in the famous ‘Wine Country’ of Northern California. People think this is a romantic place to live, but it’s actually a toxic hazard zone. The blue spaces on the map encompass the vineyards all along HWY 12. You can zoom in and out on the map to see how the alcohol industry has used up every last inch of available space for their industry. Though a couple of vintners are trying to grow organically amidst this ugly, conventional sprawl, it’s really impossible to grow anything organic along HWY 12 because of the unending, chronic dumping of pesticides up and down the highway for miles and miles.
And people live here. Thousands and thousands of them. And all of them are being poisoned.
Looking For A Fight?
I have sensed that most of us have emerged from CDFA’s recent announcement regarding not spraying over urban areas knowing we are still in a battle. No one feels settled. No one is satisfied with the idea that while CDFA may not fly their planes right over the TransAmerica building, they may be spraying Golden Gate Park, Mount Tamalpais, Rodeo Lagoon or other ‘non-urban’, neighboring areas.
We know that air moves and that we’ll be breathing in what’s in the air, no matter where it is sprayed. With China’s pollution hitting the West Coast and DDT melting out of the polar ice caps, 21st century people know that our air and water is recycled again and again through our lungs and bodies and that toxins in one place mean toxins everywhere.
If you’re sick and tired of being made ill by toxic pollution and the threat of further toxins, I believe your fight is clear here. I believe it comes down to the simple, blue equation I started with and the work ahead is in changing the mentality of Californians to match the modern understanding of pesticides as poisons. CDFA may be the worst students in the class and it may take a long time to get them to learn this lesson, but the rest of us are already protected by a constitution that guards our safety and a set of state and national laws that punish poisoners. We just need to connect dots A and B. I think this is our fight.



7 users commented in " A Simple Equation For California "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackMim,
For some time, I have thought about your situation and have felt compelled to write this posting. Your previous postings on the LBAM aerial spraying in Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties last fall and concerns for the victims of the aerial spray and the still unfolding long term health
consequences is truly what this debate is all about on a microscopic scale to a larger world-wide health and environmental crisis.
I am concerned for you and your husband and for the victims of the LBAM spray. I live in Fremont (twist tie) and my daughter attends UC Santa Cruz and she has asthma and allergies. I have been actively opposing the LBAM Program mainly for her health benefit but also because this program is so wrong in so many ways.
My husband and I have lived in the San Francisco Bay Area are entire lives. We are now in our early 60’s. We had hoped to spend the remaining years we have left here in the bay area. However, we are not so sure that living here with the LBAM Program moving forward is going to be desirable for anyone nor anything. The LBAM Program is unnecessary and unhealthy for all living things and the environment. I have hope for state, national, and global environmental change but as you read my posting, you will understand that my hope is growing thin.
It is frightening that our state’s and nation’s policies and decisions that are made by our elected officials are due mainly to lobbyist’s financial political influence and not what is in the best interests for our us, our state, our nation, and the world. It is the opinion of many individuals and researchers that this downward trend has been going on for over thirty years and this upside down political trend is on the verge of a major change and collapse. In fact, our very survival depends on it.
After spending a lot of my time reading and trying to understand the environmental crisis that the world is in, which relates on a smaller scale to the wine industry’s chemicals polluting people and the land and to LBAM and agricultural chemicals polluting us and the planet, it is imperative that the next Presidential candidate, Congress, and our state officials be the key to the environmental change that is absolutely necessary.
Global warming is and will be our environmental catalyst if we are to survive. If indeed this environmental movement does happen, the greening of the planet will transpire an environmental movement like no other and the agricultural and chemical industries will be legally mandated to change for the better.
My daughter just finished her freshman year in college and she and her friends speak openly about global warming and the earth’s pollution and understand they will be the next generation to be a part of the solution and not a part of the problem. Even when she was in high school she and her friends understood the graveness of inheriting a planet that they and their children will be unable to survive in.
I have woken up to a chemical world and global warming nightmare I largely knew nothing about. I can thank a tiny little moth, LBAM, for my newly gained knowledge. I will never go back to sleep.
It is time for a state and national constitutional amendment that prohibits pesticides and other chemicals within so many feet of people without their written consent. This is just the beginning of needed environmental changes. Mim, it may not resolve your immediate problem but it is worth getting this constitutional amendment on the next ballot.
On June 23, 2008 NASA Global Warming Scientist, Jim Hansen, testified before Congress – exactly 20 years after warning America about global warming. It gives me hope that perhaps – just perhaps – that we can save our planet and us – but we are at the tipping point and we must take drastic action now. Too much time has been wasted and we must have governmental leadership to save us. Our voices need to be loud and clear in order to survive.
I hope everyone reads the following news article and James Hansen’s Testimony before Congress. It is definitely worth the read to what lies before us and what is absolutely necessary for our survival.
News article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080624/ap_on_sc/sci_warming_scientist
James Hansen’s 6/23/08 Congressional Testimony:
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2008/TwentyYearsLater_20080623.pdf
Hi BPM -
Thank you so much for your comment, and for your very kind concern for my family. I am really concerned for yours, too.
I think you are right in that the political leaders are going to be essential, and this is why I have been paying attention to Obama’s apparent unwillingness to tie himself to the corporations in terms of his campaign funding. Politics is not my cup of tea, so I consider myself not terribly well educated on this subject, but I do agree with you 100% regarding the wreck of our government that has been wrought by the allegiance of government and corporations. You are completely right.
I am going to go read the article you’ve linked to. Thank you so much, BPM, for sharing so generously of your information as you continue along this learning path. I know you will never go back to sleep.
Mim
P.S. You may have noted I removed the 2nd comment you tried to post because it was basically a duplicate of the first and I guessed that you tried to post, but then when your post didn’t show up, you tried to post again.
Just so you know, when a comment contains 2 or more links, my blog holds it in moderation. It’s a way of keeping the blog safe from spammers who would come in and fill a post with links to erroneous things.
Please, keep linking away to what you find, but just know I then have to approve the comment before it appears live. Hope that’s helpful information for you!
Mim and BPM,
It is so helpful that you share your stories. Even though is is very sad to read what you are experiencing, I feel that others will identify and perhaps understand that they can become more active too. I was never political until the 2000 “election” and that did it for me. It’s not that I was looking for a fight but that I saw a desperate need to be counted. Now my husband, as I have told you, has a disease which relates directly to chemicals and I too have been sick so many days in my lifetime from causes that have remained unexplained. Alternative care has been a blessing and without that I don’t know if I would still be here. Like you, BPM, our dream of living out our lives in California has pretty much come to an end. We are fighting something very strange. We are addressing ideologues or as you more aptly described them, Mim, zombies who are really frightening in their dedication to things they can’t even explain. In one article I read, Kawamura was being challenged for scientific proof of his position and all he could say was “I believe” this will work. Scary! I have said before, this is a wake-up call. I’m sure we all wish it had come a little sooner but it is a battle which must continue for all those precious people who are our human family. The people of Northern California have come out against the spraying, not just for their own protection but to save others. I think this community is wonderful for many reasons but for their altruism most of all.
Hi Mary Anne,
We did a lot of research about where to live as a result of the LBAM spraying. The conclusion I reached was that, with the way things are right now, there wasn’t really a ‘safe’ place to live in this country.
I thought about the desert…but they are still doing nuclear testing there, under the ground.
I thought about the forested places…but the forest service is horrendous in its spraying.
I thought about the ocean but realized that, without major investment in greenhouses and things like that, it wouldn’t be a suitable place for growing food, so that ruled that out.
Because nearly all land is owned by:
1) Neighbors who may be spraying or cleaning with toxins
2) Agribusinesses with their constant spraying
3) Other businesses with toxic practices
4) Agencies like the forestry service, state parks, etc. who are also always spraying
I couldn’t come up with a solution better than trying to find someplace that felt a little bit safe, from which I could continue to work for a change in the way people live.
So, what is a ‘safer’ place? Well, there are a few places in California that might be offer a better choice.
For example, there is a town in Northern California called Sebastopol. Not only have they banned city pesticide spraying there, but they also refused to have cell towers erected because of health concerns. They are a progressive little community.
Then there is the county of Mendocino – a stunningly beautiful place. They banned the growing of GMO crops there a couple of years ago. Very cool.
My bet is that there are other places like this, in different states, where the people are working to be more intelligent in their way of life. Maybe your family could find such a place? I would love to see this.
Something that did occur to me as a potentially good spot to look for a home would be amongst horse ranches. They don’t smell terrible like cattle ranches and people would likely take good, non-toxic care of their land so as to protect their horses.
It takes creativity, for sure, but I am going to pray that both your family and BPMs can find a place that feels a little bit safer, and we will all keep working to promote zero tolerance for toxins.
But I believe the challenge is nation-wide. I was reading a book a while ago about Kansas and all of the farmers there attend meetings called Pesticide Dinners. Can you believe that? These are dinners hosted by the chemical corporations. They feed the farmers and introduce them to new pesticides. Can you imagine going to something called a Pesticide Dinner?
So, I think Americans are surrounded by the chemical problem everywhere, but this means that many of them are seeing health damage, so the potential for them to relate to what we’re talking about is certainly there.
I am so sorry for the suffering in your family, Mary Anne. You deserve so much better than this.
Mim
Thank you, Mim. So many of us are suffering and it is so very sad that this beautiful world is being devastated. It is good to hear about Mendocino and Sebastopol.
We have a new governor in Colorado who tries to be green. He has asthma himself so he understands. It is such an uphill battle. Here they try to trick people into having chemlawn spray their grass. They come and spray and then apologize when you tell them you didn’t ask for it. Then you have that poison all over your yard. They did it to my son last year and he had been so good about keeping his yard natural.
The farmers are being so used by the chemical industries. I was listening to a broadcast on “Ring of Fire” last week. They were talking about how the chemical companies are even trying to dictate what seeds should be used on these people’s own land. Apparently inspectors come around to see that the seeds are used only for one growing season too.
We must find a way to free everyone from this terrible influence. I am constantly trying to think of ways to approach this problem although I’m a “newby” compared to you.
Interesting – it used to be Bingo in small towns, now it’s pesticide dinners! Not very appetizing is it? We lived in Kansas for a while. We never stopped smelling pesticide. We would actually feel sick from it after an evening walk. This was in the city away from the farmland but we still experienced it constantly.
Thanks again for all the information, Mim. I don’t know how you keep up with it but its great and everyone owes you for this wonderful service you provide.
Take care
Mary Anne
Hi Mary Anne,
I didn’t know you’d lived in Kansas. So you know what that’s like, first-hand!
I am furious to hear about chemlawn being sprayed on people’s grass. That is trespass! Sounds like a good fight to take on for anyone living in Colorado.
Yes, the fact is the big chemical agencies, particularly Monsanto, have an obvious goal in mind: to control the world’s food supply and make the growing of all food, all plants, show them a profit whether in rural America or the impoverished countryside of India.
This is why Monstanto is, in my eyes, the world’s #1 enemy. We are born here and have the right to eat food, just as the butterflies, the birds and the bears do. It is our right to find food on our Earth. For anyone to monetize this process is truly diabolical.
And it’s not like, “I will pay farmer Bill to grow my wheat, because I don’t have a big enough field to grown wheat to make my own bread. Farmer Bill will do it, and I’ll honor him with money.”
It’s, “I owe my soul to Monsanto. My Monsanto brand seeds won’t grow unless I spray with Monsanto’s roundup, and my food crops will provide no seed for next year’s planting. I will have to buy seed every year from Monsanto, or we will starve.”
One of the main factors that created civilization as we know it today was the human discovery that plants regenerate themselves so that food this year can mean food next year. Monsanto wants to change all of that, and they are so mixed up with the government, they’re being given permission to do this rather than being punished as crazy people.
Oh, my, it’s all pretty overwhelming, Mary Anne. And ends up with Pesticide Dinners in Kansas. I so wish the farmers would fight back. Well, one of them that I know of did. You might be interested in this website, particularly the coverage of small farmers trying to fight off Monsanto:
http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm#farmers
Mim
Thanks for the link, Mim. I notice it has a petition too. I couldn’t get the You Tube movie to show. Maybe it was temporarily down. Strange how the spraying has turned our attention to so many of these problems. I am sure the chem companies didn’t mean for that to happen. I hope everyone will stay fired up. A few people can change the world but it’s a tough job. I know I plan to contribute whatever I can. I have always felt that we are here on this earth to let it become our paradise. We have been going in the wrong direction for a long time.
I was thinking of Henry Miller this week because of the fire and danger to the library. I keep this quote on my email, “One’s destination is never a place but rather a new way of looking at things”. I feel this time is asking all of us to do this.
Take care and be well, Mim,
Mary Anne
Leave A Reply