This week, former presidential adviser, Karl Rove, has been the subject of international headlines, greeting the demands that he appear before Congress with a queer and deafening silence. According to his lawyer, Rove has been ordered by the White House (the Bush Administration) not to obey the subpoena or give testimony about the possible politicization of the Department of Justice. Congress may have to send out the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest Rove and bring him to a hearing, no matter what President Bush wants.
A couple of weeks ago, I watched Senator Barbara Boxer convene a hearing, the subject of which was the profound corruption that has rotted away the core of the Environmental Protection Agency. Special interests, dirty money and corrupt politicians have changed the mission of the EPA from being one of protecting public and environmental health to being one of protecting the profits of chemical manufacturers and polluters. Strangely, the head of the EPA did not show up for the hearing, despite requests that he be present to answer questions regarding the obvious criminal activity going on in his agency. Again, there was a very strange silence in that room, filled with senators and media but lacking any testimony from the head of the EPA.
Here in California, we have the same silence ringing in our ears. With the threat of a biochemical assault hanging over the heads of 7 millions citizens, people are demanding answers to their questions and are being met with silence.
I want to know why U.S. Congressman Sam Farr’s direct demand that USDA Secretary, Ed Schafer, and Undersecretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs, Bruce Knight, explain to him how the LBAM was classified as a class A pest in the first place has still not received a reply over a month later.
I want to know why Major Tim Wilcox, whose baby nearly died after being forced by the CDFA to inhale Checkmate Pesticide in 2007, has never received the slightest acknowledgment from Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to whom he wrote, pleading for help.
I want to know why neither Sen. Diane Feinstein, Sen. Barbara Boxer, Senator Carol Migden and Congresswoman Barbara Lee’s letters to the USDA and other officials have received no reply.
I want to know why the Monterey Bay Aquarium refused to let their neighbors speak to their staff regarding the dangers of spraying Monterey Bay, and why, even after hundreds of sea birds died from Checkmate spray, the aquarium has maintained a mysterious silence about the poisoning.
I want to know why not one of the 43 Californian Audubon Society chapters I’ve contacted cares that birds have been and will be killed by blanket aerial spraying of California. I want to know why I have not received a single concerned reply.
What can you add to my list?
The policy of silence in California is deadly. Hundreds of families have already been sickened, untold wildlife has died, and our air and water has been polluted with biochemicals and microscopic plastic which causes human fatality. Again and again, our demands for reasonable answers, for rational explanations as to the logic behind this assault on California are met with, at best, lies and at worst, utter silence.
It would appear that what they are experiencing in Washington D.C., with a president who can order someone to defy congress and a host of agencies that are sweltering in sickly corruption, is happening across the United States.
Let it be remembered that when the Ford Pinto was put out on the market, the manufacturers knew that a certain percentage of purchasers would die because of a malfunction in the car’s construction. But, Ford did the math. And, they realized that the total they would have to pay out in lawsuits was less than the total profits they would make before the car was recalled. So, they made a choice. The innocent people who would die were expendable, because a good margin of profit could still be accrued by releasing the car.
And, isn’t this what we are seeing in our nation and state? For whatever dark and unspeakable reason, the profit being made off the illegal spraying of human beings makes sense to a few criminals. When infants like little Jack Wilcox go into respiratory failure, when infants die after 2, 3, 100, 450 exposures to this deadly pesticide, perhaps a few dollars will be paid out in lawsuits if anyone is committed enough to actually get a ruling against the perpetrators. The money that will have to go out, however, cannot compare to the billions coming in for CDFA and Stewart Resnick, manufacturer of this poison.
They need only bide their time. Keep mum. Spray the people. Scrape away their piles of money. Deal with some small consequences later. In this life, silence is serving them well.



10 users commented in " A Deadly Policy of Silence – LBAM Spray and the USA "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackCongress is finally enacting their Constitutional duties!
LBAM Update:
The Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties Court Orders specify only LBAM aerial spraying will stop while CDFA does an Environmental Impact Report. It does appear that the LBAM Ground Treatment will be moving forward.
See posted forum at Stop the Spray:
http://forum.stopthespray.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1335&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a#p1897
We have lost a part of our democracy since investigative news reporters are fewer due to the decline of newspaper subscriptions. One of the investigative news programs I routinely watch is Bill Moyers Journal (PBS). If you haven’t seen Bill Moyers ‘Buying The War’ the program examines this evidence. More and more the media become common carriers of administration statements. Here’s the website link to watch ‘Buying The War’:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html
LBAM Court Order Update:
Santa Cruz and Monterey Court Orders rescind CDFA’s ‘Notice of Exemption’ and LBAM Project is therefore subject to EIR (no spraying afterall).
some of the politicians who have been met with silence have been strangely silent on the spray till recently, boxer, farr and feinstein.
BPM -
Can you help me get the gist of what you’ve posted? My understanding is that only the aerial spraying was halted until an EIR is performed in both Santa Cruz and Monterey. However, CDFA intends to appeal these and is boasting that they will be start spraying there in August. Do you concur with this or am I mistaken? I value your opinion, and I quite agree regarding Bill Moyers. He is among the last of the tradition of great investigative journalism.
It makes me wish we could bring Woodward and Bernstein in on the spraying – you know, the reporters who broke Watergate in the 60s.
Donna -
This is what I don’t understand. Why does it seem like writing letters is the most senators can do? Can’t they demand a hearing, a tv news conference, an audience with the president?
If we knew that a foreign country was going to drop poison California a couple of months from now, would the senators do more than write letters?
While I really do appreciate what these politicians have done, it just isn’t enough when so many lives are at stake.
Thanks for stopping by, both of you!
Mim
Mim,
I’ve updated my stopthespray post. It does appear that the Court decisions were for aerial spray only but there is some disagreement as noted on my post that the Court decision, especially in Santa Cruz, also included stopping the ground treatment (see LBAMSPRAY further into my post). I’m currently in the process of seeking this clarification from knowledgeable individuals involved with LBAM.
Here’s my post:
http://forum.stopthespray.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1335&p=1897#p1897
As T.S Elliot once said in The Hallow Men, we will not go “with a bang but a wimper”. Live now, pay later. I’m beginning to realize there are two kinds of people on this small planet – those who care about the world we are borrowing from our children and grand-children, and those that don’t. I hope those that care will start making more noise and demand some answers, and then question those answers until satisfied.
bpm,
yes, there is a lot of confusion re. whether the santa cruz ruling applies to ground treatment or not. re. your timetables, this is from the lbamspray.com site. it appears to be saying it is possible that an eir report could be done by august:
The Santa Cruz court ruling will only TEMPORARILY stop the Ground and Aerial treatments in Santa Cruz County until an EIR has been completed (3-9 month from now). On May 8, 2008, in Monterey County HOPE.org will challange the CDFA’s LBAM eradication program on the exact same points as did Santa Cruz, and if the Monterey court rules like the SC Courts did on 4/24/08. The CDFA will be forced to complete an EIR before any ground or aerial spray can contine or start.
there was also a news report that their testing of various products being tested in new zealand are now complete. they are trying to make sure they are not harmful now. do you think they might decide theyre not harmful and not use them on us?
Donna, I really appreciate you weighing in on this. It has been very confusing. But now I’m afraid I’m more confused. The Monterey lawsuit already happened. Your comment almost sounds like you are saying this will happen in future. I’m sorry…I must be misunderstanding what you are saying. I’ve got a cold today!
Adding to the confusion is that CDFA’s website says they intend to start aerially spraying the Central Coast August 17th…in other words, break the ruling of the court, which I’m assuming would be held as a criminal act.
On the other hand, it might mean they are certain they will overturn the ruling and spray without hindrance.
Mim
Oh – I am foolish. You were quoting from elsewhere. See, I’ve got a stuffy head today
Mim
Leave A Reply